9 Comments
Apr 8Liked by Common Daisy

One of the key statements you make is the one regarding support in the U.S. That is eroding. There isn’t much support for Israel among the young. As the age demographic rotates, and the population makeup changes Israel’s support will disappear. When that happens Israel will stand alone and the game will change dramatically. It won’t be fun when the rabbit has the gun.

Expand full comment

IF Israel is making it's own weapons and selling them then why is the US sending them more?

Expand full comment
author

The United States' relationship with Israel, particularly concerning military aid and weapons transfers, is a complex and multifaceted issue. Criticism and concerns about this relationship stem from several key factors:

1. Strategic Alliances and Military Support: The U.S. provides significant military aid to Israel to maintain a strong strategic alliance in a volatile region where Israel faces constant security threats form the US point of view.

2. Shared Interests and Technology Exchange: Despite Israel's ability to produce its weapons and technology, the U.S. and Israel collaborate extensively in defence research and development. This partnership allows for the exchange of advanced military technologies and intelligence, benefiting both.

3. Political and Lobbying Influence: The influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups in the U.S., such as AIPAC, is a significant factor in shaping U.S. foreign policy towards Israel. These groups advocate for robust support for Israel, emphasizing shared security interests.

4. Concerns over Misuse and Re-export of U.S. Weapons: One of the key criticisms is the potential misuse or re-export of U.S.-supplied weapons and technology by Israel. There have been instances where Israel's actions have raised concerns about adherence to arms agreements and export controls.

5. Competition in Arms Sales: Israel's defence industry, buoyed by U.S. aid, has become a major exporter of military hardware and technology. This has sometimes led to competition with American defence contractors in international arms markets, creating tensions within the U.S. defence industry.

6. Legislative and Political Constraints: Criticism of Israel's policies or questioning military aid to Israel can be politically sensitive in the U.S., given the strong bipartisan support for Israel and the influence of pro-Israel lobbying groups on Capitol Hill.

Expand full comment
Apr 8Liked by Common Daisy

The reason the Middle East is so "volatile" is that Europeans and Americans have been meddling in their affairs, trying to take over their resources, for aeons. Many of the M.E. leaders were put in power by either the Europeans or the Americans in the first place. Enough already.

The U.S. gives far more than a paltry $3.8 billion per year in aid. They just label is as other things and play financial games with the money they do give. Which, I might add, they don't actually have so those of us who can least afford to pay for it through inflation. And that is world-wide since most countries are still buying fossil fuels with US dollars. But not for long, thankfully. The house of cards is about to fall.

Expand full comment
Apr 8Liked by Common Daisy

We can’t dismiss the eschatology aspect of the relationship as well.

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Apr 8Liked by Common Daisy

Extensive article thank you

Expand full comment
Apr 8Liked by Common Daisy

I like your emphasis on basic moral values when assessing Israel. My generation grew up with the memory of the Holocaust that was turned into a tool to justify Israel's crimes. Thankfully, that does no longer work with younger generations. How does Israel keep tabs on the Palestinian population, I always wonder. It's one important way to control an occupied population and create "targets" when attacking Palestinians. Do you have information on that topic? Thank you.

Expand full comment